Entrepreneurs Academy
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 844713958
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Chicago, IL, USA
- Rating
- 56
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Vocational, Technical Schools
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $611,817
- Expenses
- $461,732
- Assets
- $312,899
- Liabilities
- $115,486
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PHILIP FAIRWEA (PRESIDENT)
- PHILIP FAIRWEA (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- PHILIP FAIRWEA (PRESIDENT): $75,898 total reported compensation
- PHILIP FAIRWEA (PRESIDENT): $75,898 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide pathways to entrepreneurship, workforce modernization, and invovation for under-resourced communities of color to create a safer, healthier, and more economically inclusive world.
What it reported doing in 2023
Entrpreneurship training program - training workshops which are
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 52
- Transparency & Controls: 78
- Accountability: 21
- Sustainability: 50
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 43.1%; rating input score 43
- Program expense ratio: 57.1%; rating input score 57
- Fundraising efficiency: $48.98 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 81.8%; rating input score 82; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 24.5%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.68; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.37; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 32.9%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 71.7% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 50% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 108.8% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 43.1% of revenue deployed · 57.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 3 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $263K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $76K · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 26 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2022 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 43/100.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 57/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule D other liabilities reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.