Entrepreneurial Engagement Ohio
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 371644646
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Cleveland, OH, USA
- Phone
- 4408212357
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Youth Development Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $132,103
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Dr Julian M Earls (President)
- Bruce Keller (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- James Phipps (Director)
- Dr Woodrow Whitlow (Director)
- Dr Katrina Cornish (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of EEO is: 1) to promote student and community awareness as to the challenges and opportunities the changing regional, national and global economies present for the future; and 2) to provide educational instruction, curriculum, research, training, mentoring and other information that helps develop the entrepreneurial, economic, business, and scientific literacy of students and the community.
What it reported doing in 2023
Statewide Ohio STEM Entrepreneurship and Innovation Programming - In 2012, EEO entered into a collaboration with the Ohio Academy of Science ("OAS") to develop a statewide Ohio Youth STEM Commercialization and Entrepreneurship program, which later became known as the Believe in Ohio ("BiO") program. The BiO program included many of the program elements that EEO had earlier developed for Northeast Ohio.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Member-benefit provider. The nonprofit used 87% of its reported program spending for member benefits.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 34
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 2
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 90%; rating input score 90
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.5%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -12.9% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.2% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 90% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $119K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2012 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.