Entiat Valley Community Servicesfoodbank

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
260901943
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Entiat, WA, USA
Phone
5098883999
Rating
93
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Food Banks, Pantries

Reported finances

Revenue
$134,605
Expenses
$133,394
Assets
$105,528
Liabilities
$94,441

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Marla Hansen (President)
  • Doug Cox (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Marla Hansen (President)
  • Doug Cox (Vice President)
  • Carol Seat (Secretary Board of Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

By assisting the underprivileged, those in need and commiting to provide solutions to alleviate poverty, homelessness and hunger. We help the disadvantage, providing a hand up, not a hand out. Serve all people with respect, dignity and compassion, regardless of circumstances or where they reside.

What it reported doing in 2024

SAIL (Stay Active for Independent Living) provided twice a week one hour each time (Participants are between 60 and 91 years of age) Also provide resources for them. Adopt A Family at XMas 2023 there were 14 families with 71 indivduals helped. Food Bank twice a month with over 100 lbs of food up to 200 of food depending on the number in the families provided over 83.526 this past year. Resources include medical transportation, medical supplies and information as needed. Direct services to over 17,500 low income families, veterans, homeless, and disabled. Distributing hygiene items, transportation assistance, clothing, applying for benefits, and referrals.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 72% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 99
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 99.1%; rating input score 99
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.9%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.79; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.89; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -0.3% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.8% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 99.1% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $133K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.