Enterprise Palm Beach Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
371875408
IRS 990 coverage
2019–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2018
Location
Delray Beach, FL, USA
Phone
8282797712
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Nonprofit Management

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$824,793
Expenses
$503,024
Assets
$326,645
Liabilities
$1,001

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Sienna Leis (President)

People named in this filing

  • Sienna Leis (President)
  • Tanaka Adam (Treasurer)
  • Bryan Sanchez (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We believe that global change is possible through community transformation. By removing obstacles, inviting collective visioning and facilitating project co-creation, we connect funding with solutions. Our model of transparency and authenticity enables efficient galvanizing of resources toward impactful outcomes.

What it reported doing in 2024

Our organization supported and fiscally sponsored the following organizations. For The Sake of Argument (FSA): FSA is a fiscally sponsored, non-partisan educational initiative that helps communities harness the power of healthy civil discourse Launched in 2022 it develops tools and workshops for constructive debate on divisive issues, and has already helped over 50 partner organizations embrace ? healthy arguments? to transform their conversations In 2025, FSA secured over $900,000 in new grants to scale its impact; this support enables the training of approximately 2,000 educators in facilitation skills and has facilitated wide distribution of FSA? s methods (including 4,000 copies of its educational book sold) to classrooms and communities worldwide. MENTOR Florida: Launched in 2024 and fiscally sponsored by our organization, MENTOR Florida builds on 15 years of local mentoring success in Palm Beach County as it becomes the new statewide affiliate of the national MENTOR network, expanding youth mentoring beyond Palm Beach to serve communities across Florida Backed by our support, MENTOR Florida provides training, advocacy, and resources to local mentoring programs, aiming to close the ? mentoring gap? so that every young person (one in three currently lack a mentor) can benefit from a caring mentor This initiative now partners with organizations and leaders statewide to reach more at-risk youth and families across the state, ensuring that more young people have the guidance and opportunities they need to thrive.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 88% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 56
  • Transparency & Controls: 86
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 69
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 51.1%; rating input score 51
  • Program expense ratio: 83.7%; rating input score 84
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 39%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.65; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 30.3% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 50.1% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 51.1% of revenue deployed · 83.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $421K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 24 of 25 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2019 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 51/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.