Enrichpak Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 870947970
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022
- Location
- South Richmond Hills, NY, USA
- Rating
- 36
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $196
- Expenses
- $66
- Assets
- $6,212
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- INTISAR U MIRZA (V PRESIDENT)
- FAISAL MIRZA (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- INTISAR U MIRZA (V PRESIDENT)
- FAISAL MIRZA (PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To establish educational health care hospital clinic study and reserach centres of learning and other educational but do not act as a degree awarding institute.
What it reported doing in 2022
To establish manage maintain own administer promote and subsidize educational institutions health care hospitals clinic medicine health related and varities of medicinal prepartions computor literacy centre schools colleges institutions for study and reasearch centres of learning reading rooms and other institutions for basic education adult literacy advance studies and other educational fora with the permission of computor authority but not to act as a degree awarding institute. To provide scholarships to students and grant aid including supply of books stipends medals prizes grants awards medicines educational career suppport bursaries and other incentives for purposes of advancement of knowledge educational and literacy
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 6
- Sustainability: 88
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: Limited
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 66.3%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 94.12; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 12 of 12 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 7 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.