Enotah Properties Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
810811529
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-T 2020
Location
Young Harris, GA, USA
Phone
7063793111
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Real Estate Associations

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$207
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$1,316

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

People named in this filing

  • DR DREW L VAN HORN (CHAIRMAN)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for charitable, religious, educational and scientific purposes within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the united states internal revenue code of 1986, as amended (the "code") (or the corresponding provision of any future united states internal revenue law), and not specifically prohibited to nonprofit corporations under the laws of the state of Georgia, for the benefit of young harris college, an organization that is described by section 170(b)(i )(a)(ii) of the code, and for such related purposes as may be permitted to corporations that are organized under the Georgia nonprofit corporation code and that are described in section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code.

What it reported doing in 2024

Operated exclusively for the benefit of fulfilling the mission of young harris college.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 38
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 7
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 48.3% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: -12.1% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $207 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.