Enfield Village Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
311699752
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2016, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2013
Location
Enfield, NH, USA
Phone
6036327197
Rating
44
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community, Neighborhood Development

Reported finances

Revenue
$28,647
Expenses
$37,376
Assets
$428,454
Liabilities
$25,085

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Julie Eckert (President)

People named in this filing

  • Julie Eckert (President)
  • Alice Kennedy (Secretary)
  • Maynard Southard (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

See Schedule O

What it reported doing in 2025

Exempt Purpose: To restore economic vitality to the downtown business district of Enfield, NH, including the purchase and rehabilitation of deteriorated buildings in the district, to encourage economic development for all businesses within the town, and to foster a town-wide sense of community centered on the downtown business district.Program Accomplishments for 2025: Greeley House Project: continued serving as the office of the Enfield Village Association, while also housing a two-bedroom affordable housing rental unit. The current tenants renewed their lease in 2025 and the monthly rent has remained unchanged. Business Coffee Project: EVA continued sponsoring monthly Business Coffees during 2025 to casually unite Enfield Businesses to showcase themselves and provide business networking, education and brainstorming. Business After Hours events were also held to increase opportunities for business networking. Green-Up Day Project: EVA continued to sponsor the annual town clean-up in advance of the Memorial Day festivities. Volunteers were recruited online and scheduled individually to canvass certain zones across town over two weekends. EVA set up three collection points for no contact drop-off of trash bags and collected items. The Shaker 7 Run/Walk around Mascoma Lake was suspended for this year and will resume in 2026 as part of the towns United States Semiquincentennial celebration. Main Street Flowers and Beautification Project: EVA continued their annual plantings and supplies to volunteers who continued to tend and improve flower boxes and small gardens around town. Additionally, the Beautification Committee again decorated Main Street for the Holidays with fresh garlands, lights on the lampposts, and fresh wreaths on the fences and bridge. The Harvest Fest Scarecrows Project: EVA coordinated the design, construction and deployment of Scarecrows around town during the Fall. The designs are based on business, nonprofit, government and recreational themes and displayed around town to draw attention to those groups and themes. Many volunteers refreshed and redesigned Scarecrows, located display locations around town, collected the scarecrows after about a month of display and returned them to storage for use next year. EVA decided to end the printed Business Directory Project and focus attention on the directorys Online version. All told, in 2025 over 1,500 volunteer hours fueled EVA events and activities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 71% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 15
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 44
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 17.6%; rating input score 18
  • Program expense ratio: 11.3%; rating input score 11

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -30.5%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 11.46; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -19% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1% per year; rating input score 0; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 17.6% of revenue deployed · 11.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $4K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2017 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 18/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 11/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 17/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.