Energy Outreach Colorado

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
742543881
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Denver, CO, USA
Phone
3038258750
Rating
89
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Camps

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$84,974,563
Expenses
$76,908,828
Assets
$50,648,379
Liabilities
$9,100,210

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

27 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JENNIFER GREMMERT (CEO)
  • MOE TABRIZI (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • JENNIFER GREMMERT (CEO): $431,051 total reported compensation
  • JONATHAN ILDERTON (EXECUTIVE DI): $243,692 total reported compensation
  • ERIC NUSSBAUMER (VP DATA OPER): $186,387 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provide energy assistance and energy efficiency programs to income-qualified Coloradans. Nonprofit & Multifamily Programs Energy Outreach Colorado supports nonprofits and multifamily affordable housing with energy efficiency programs. We offer funding for energy-saving equipment and large-scale improvements and aim to reduce energy costs for organizations serving income-qualified communities and affordable housing residents. Energy Outreach Colorado supports nonprofits and multifamily affordable housing with energy efficiency programs. Nonprofit Energy Efficiency Program.

What it reported doing in 2024

The crisis internvention program is funded by the Colorado low-income energy assistance program and provides eligible households with emergency furnace repair and replacement services to ensure families have adequate access to heat. The nonprofit energy assistance program (neep) provides long term solutions and energy efficiency upgrades in nonprofit facilities to reduce energy use and lower energy bills. Current funders include the city of denver, state of Colorado, and xcel energy; funds are restricted. Advocacy and commission is setup to advocate for the energy needs of low- income Colorado residents. Low income energy assistance payments were made to the Colorado department of human services to be used in their leap program that provides benefits to low-income individuals to pay energy bills. Energy outreach Colorado conducts education and outreach programs to the public. Specifically, the nffn/nliec program targes low-income advocacy nationally and through the national fuel funds network (nffn)and the national low income energy consortium (nliec). The objective of the central 70 program is to reduce noice and dust related to the i70 construction project. 251 homes received services from energy outreach. Addtionally, energy outreach completed emergency safety repairs on one-third of the homes immediately during the home assessments. Each participating home received an energy assessment, complete installation of every home improvement, and a final inspection all at no cost to residents.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 82% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 47% for direct work, and 53% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 85
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 56
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 86.7%; rating input score 87
  • Program expense ratio: 94.9%; rating input score 95
  • Fundraising efficiency: $61.23 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99%; rating input score 99; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 9.5%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.66; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.18; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.8%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 13.8% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 14.8% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
  • Where the money goes: 86.7% of revenue deployed · 94.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $73M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $431K · 27 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $7.8M reported
  • Consistency: 32 of 33 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 121 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 113 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.