Energy Federation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 042790398
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Franklin, MA, USA
- Phone
- 5082984508
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $-3,542,524
- Expenses
- $2,038,801
- Assets
- $2,886,265
- Liabilities
- $1,278,210
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PAUL DANEHY (CEO/PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- PAUL DANEHY (CEO/PRESIDENT): $297,332 total reported compensation
- DONALD MUIR (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $249,438 total reported compensation
- BRIAN KISSANE (VP, CLIENT SUCCESS MANAGEMENT): $188,622 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
See schedule o
What it reported doing in 2024
Incentive servicesduring efi's history the organization has processed incentives for hundreds of millions of energy efficient products and measures, including energy efficient lighting, appliances, high efficiency hvac equipment, advanced power strips, insulation and air sealing measures, and renewable energy systems, having issued approximately $3 billion worth of incentives on behalf of our clients to-date. Incentives such as these are to encourage consumers and businesses to invest in energy efficient products and measures that they might not otherwise. The types of incentive services that efi makes available to utilities include the following: upstream rebates, in which the incentive agreement is typically executed between the utility sponsor and a manufacturer/retailer, result in the customer price for the energy efficient product being discounted by the amount of the incentive provided by the utility. Efi verifies the purchase data provided by the manufacturer/retailer and reimburses the manufacturer/retailer. Midstream rebates, for which customer and measure eligibility is confirmed by a retailer or distributor, with the utility rebate applied by the distributor during the purchase. Efi verifies the customer and measure eligibility and reimbursed the midstream distributor. Downstream rebates are those in which the end-user must apply for a rebate subsequent to the purchase of the energy efficient measure. Efi usually supports these programs through the deployment of an online site through which required information may be entered and/or uploaded. Efi sometimes enters information from downstream rebates on behalf of the customer, but today management of downstream programs consists more of reviewing and verifying customer-submitted data. Instant rebates allow eligible customers to verify their eligibility for a utility rebate on a given product through their smart phone, select from a list of participating retailers, and have a discount code barcode sent to their phone via text that will apply the utility rebate during checkout at the retailer. The savings from the products and measures for which utilities offer financial incentives (rebates) provide significant benefits to consumers and businesses in the form of lower energy bills, they reduce the need for additional power plant development associated with electricity generation, and they result in reduced atmospheric emissions of greenhouse gasses.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 82% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 77
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 17
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 63.9%; rating input score 64
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -157.6%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.42; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.44; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 73.4%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -4.7% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.7% per year; rating input score 0; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.5% per year; rating input score 0; 37th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 63.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 5 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $1.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $297K · 13 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 13 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 15/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 29/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 11/100.