Endow
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 830362209
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Greenwood Village, CO, USA
- Phone
- 7203825242
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Women's Studies
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $786,941
- Expenses
- $736,648
- Assets
- $689,130
- Liabilities
- $15,498
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANNETTE BERGEON (CEO)
People named in this filing
- BISHOP FRANCOIS BEYROUTI (DIRECTOR)
- SUZANNE CAMERON (DIRECTOR)
- MARILYN COORS (FOUNDER & CH)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Educating women toward a deeper understanding of their god-given dignity and vocation as women. Endow's mission is to educate women and girls toward a more profound understanding of their god-given dignity and vocation by making their inheritance as a catholic woman by her baptism accessible and beautiful for her to receive in full. (see schedule o) firmly rooted in the teachings of the catholic church, the endow study recognizesand affirms the "true genius of women- and responds to our culture's desperate need for an authentic feminine presence in every aspect of life and society.
What it reported doing in 2025
Each of these programs is working with women in every corner of our society, building friendships, showing them how much they're loved, and helping them receive their treasure of inheritance as a modern catholic woman.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 61% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 50
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 78.2%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 83.4%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: $8 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.4%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.94; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.6% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.1% per year; rating input score 100; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.4% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 78.2% of revenue deployed · 83.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $614K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 16 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 28/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 48/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 41/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 52/100.