Endometrial Cancer Action Network For African Americans

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
871769413
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Seattle, WA, USA
Phone
7705978500
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Cancer Research

Reported finances

Revenue
$120,123
Expenses
$127,265
Assets
$158,418
Liabilities
$193

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Adrienne Moore (President)

People named in this filing

  • Margie Wilson (Secretary)
  • Cinnamon McCullum (Director)
  • Tiffany Drummond (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

ECANA is a sustainable infrastructure for personal empowerment to better health - through knowledge, community building, and action - for African-American women at risk and those already affected by endometrial cancer. ECANA promotes transparent, equity-directed patient-centered research to reduce racial disparities in endometrial cancer through project development, training patient advisors, and public promotion of research efforts.

What it reported doing in 2025

Execution of the Survivor Sanctuary - Survivors' Sanctuary, a support group for Black women with EC, meets 4-5 times a month. In 2025, a bi-yearly book club with special meeting dates was added. On average there are 4 sessions a month, in addition to special guest sessions. In 2025 there were 9 book club special meetings and 10 Survivors Sanctuary Presents sessions.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 72
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 35
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 73.5%; rating input score 73
  • Program expense ratio: 68.9%; rating input score 69

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -5.9%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.24; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 19.3%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 69.7% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.8% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.9% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 73.5% of revenue deployed · 68.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $88K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 46/100.