Endocrine Society

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
730531256
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Washington, DC, United States
Phone
+1.202.971.3611
Rating
64
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Medical Disciplines

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$27,332,119
Expenses
$28,871,883
Assets
$81,408,678
Liabilities
$22,690,002

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

32 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOHN NEWELL-PRICE (PRESIDENT (AS OF 6/24))
  • CAROL LANGE (PRESIDENT ELECT (AS OF 6/24))
  • STEPHEN HAMMES (IMM. PAST PRESIDENT (AS OF 6/24))
  • URSULA KAISER (IMM. PAST PRESIDENT (TO 6/24))
  • KATE FRYER (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)

Highest reported compensation

  • KATE FRYER (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $794,805 total reported compensation
  • ROB LASH (CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER): $468,602 total reported compensation
  • ZERIHUN HAILE-ZELASSIE (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $444,437 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Endocrine Society is a global community of physicians and scientists dedicated to accelerating scientific breakthroughs and improving patient health and well being.

What it reported doing in 2024

Professional development programs (early career):. The endocrine society's professional and clinical affairs division consists of three core areas: clinical practice guidelines, professional development, and pipeline development programs. Through these programs, the society works to improve the care of patients with endocrine disorders and to support the next generation of endocrine clinicians and scientists.clinical practice guideline programthe endocrine society provides the field of endocrinology with timely, evidence-based recommendations for clinical care and practice. Our clinical practice guidelines are developed to assist health care providers, patients, and other stakeholders in making informed decisions about appropriate health care options for endocrine-related conditions. We update our guidelines to reflect evolving clinical science and meet the needs of practicing providers. Our guidelines are developed with a commitment to the highest standards of trustworthiness and transparency as defined by the institute of medicine. Guideline authors include a multidisciplinary panel of experts, along with patient representatives to ensure that recommendations are patient centered. Recent guidelines published by the society include:-vitamin d for the prevention of disease (2024)-diagnosis and therapy of glucocorticoid-induced adrenal insufficiency (joint with the european society of endocrinology) (2024)-primary aldosteronism (2025)-pre-existing diabetes and pregnancy (joint with the european society of endocrinology)professional developmentin addition to providing clinical guidance, the society works with early career professionals who show strong potential as future leaders in endocrinology, connecting them with training, mentorship, and professional development. Through this work, the society prepares the next generation of endocrine leaders to advance science and improve care for people affected by endocrine conditions around the world.-future leaders advancing research in endocrinology (flare) is a one-year program that prepares basic scientists, clinical research trainees, and junior faculty to become leaders in endocrine research. Participants benefit from a structured leadership development workshop, hands-on training in key areas such as grantsmanship, strong peer networks, and direct mentorship from senior investigators. -excellence in clinical endocrinology leadership (excel) is a two-year program that prepares early career endocrinologists to become leaders in clinical care. The program includes a dedicated leadership development workshop and practical training in areas such as patient care, clinical decision-making, and practice management. Participants build lasting peer connections and receive one-on-one guidance from experienced clinical leaders.pipeline developmentto address workforce challenges, the endocrine society is committed to the development of the next generation of endocrine clinicians and scientists. The united states is facing a shortage of endocrinologists and the number of medical students entering the field over the past ten years has fallen. These programs work to spark interest in endocrinology among medical students, graduate students, and postgraduate trainees.-the society's early career forum targets each of the above groups. Attendees receive training in areas such as identifying career paths, applying for jobs, and developing their cvs. Early career forum participants also receive networking and educational opportunities as attendees at the society's annual meeting.-the research experiences for graduate and medical students (regms) is a full year program for medical and graduate students interested in pursuing endocrine research. This program provides funding for students to conduct research with an endocrine society mentor. Participants submit abstracts that are highlighted at society's annual meeting.-the medical school engagement program (msep) works with medical school faculty to inc

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 83% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 56
  • Transparency & Controls: 72
  • Accountability: 85
  • Sustainability: 35
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 65.4%; rating input score 65
  • Program expense ratio: 59.6%; rating input score 60
  • Fundraising efficiency: $0.98 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 86.7%; rating input score 87; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Fail
    • Conducts field audits: Fail
    • May suspend future funding: Fail
    • Requires financial reports: Fail
    • Conducts site visits: Fail
    • Requires grant agreements: Fail
    • May require repayment: Fail
  • Grant itemization coverage: 90.4%; rating input score 90; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: No; rating input score 0

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 75%; rating input score 75; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -5.6%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.82; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.28; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 14.9%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -3.5% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.6% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 8 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 65.4% of revenue deployed · 59.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 16 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $17.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $795K · 32 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $3.5M reported
  • Consistency: 39 of 42 current checks pass · 3 findings to review
  • Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 21 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 2/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 7 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 15/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 49/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.