End Blind

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
813525402
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2018
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2018
Location
Las Vegas, NV, USA
Phone
7035973753
Rating
34
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Blind/Visually Impaired Centers

Reported finances

Revenue
$250
Expenses
$0
Assets
$3,758
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Ram Reddy Thummala (President/Secretary/Treasurer/Director)

People named in this filing

  • Ram Reddy Thummala (President/Secretary/Treasurer/Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

End Blind aims to motivate and help visually impaired children participate in computer education. The plan is to achieve this by setting up computer labs and hiring teachers to teach basic computer usage to poor blind school kids so they can utilize computers for their knowledge and education. Once trained, try to find opportunities for them in the industry so they can live their lives without depending on others. Also develop different profiles on these blind kids and develop a plan to facilitate these kids to achieve their goals with measures to track their development, conduct summer camps where the blind kids are provided opportunities to participate in sports and other outdoor activities. In addition, provide poor blind school girls sanitary napkins so they can attend classes and participate in activities with confidence.

What it reported doing in 2018

Trying to work with NGOs in India to teach computers, conduct summer camps and distribute personal hygiene items( for girls like sanitary napkins) for blind kids. Identified partner NGO and will work on the above in 2019.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 9
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: Limited
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -130% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.5% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2016 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.