Encompass Yamhill Valley

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
853081668
IRS 990 coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Mcminnville, OR, USA
Phone
5044332411
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Homeless Centers

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$375,109
Expenses
$422,384
Assets
$22,167
Liabilities
$7,905

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CARRIE MARTIN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • STEPHANIE EADS PAUL (BOARD PRESIDENT)
  • KATRINA HIGGINS (BOARD VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • CARRIE MARTIN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $60,223 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide lowbarier housing and essential services for individuals and families experiencing houselessness in yamhill county, while building a broad coalition of community partners committed to creating lasting solutions to end homelessness. Activities include providing emergency services such as food assistance, clothing, gas vouchers, laundry vouchers, emergency grants, and the safe overnight vehicle park program. Additionally, encompass works to develop and operate transitional housing communities for specialized population experiencing houselessness.

What it reported doing in 2024

Other programs: parkview transitional micro-community encompass yamhill valley is planning the parkview transitional micro-community to provide safe, temporary housing for individuals and families experiencing homelessness. The project will feature small private units with shared facilities, paired with case management and supportive services to help residents transition to permanent housing and greater stability. Inclement weather shelter program encompass yamhill valley coordinates and publicizes warming and cooling shelter locations throughout yamhill county in partnership with local churches, agencies, and volunteers. The program also provides supplies and direct support to ensure that vulnerable individuals and families have safe options during periods of extreme heat or cold.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 92% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 68
  • Transparency & Controls: 93
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 15
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 75.1%; rating input score 75
  • Program expense ratio: 66.7%; rating input score 67
  • Fundraising efficiency: $8.52 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 97%; rating input score 97; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -12.6%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.05; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.36; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 14.3%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 76.6% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 57.1% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -88.7% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 75.1% of revenue deployed · 66.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $282K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $60K · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 35/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 4/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 14/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 25/100.