Encompass Heights Elementary School PTA
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 901766905
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Colorado Spri, CO, USA
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $35,212
- Expenses
- $26,429
- Assets
- $50,846
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Jamie Jarecki-Smith (President)
- Sarah Gohn (Vice President)
- Jody Purcell (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Jamie Jarecki-Smith (President)
- Sarah Gohn (Vice President)
- Jody Purcell (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
501.c.3
What it reported doing in 2024
We have at least one monthly event. We start the year off with our Fun Run. That is the biggest amount of money we take in for the year. We then use that money to pay for teacher grants, Ameritown Field Trip, and things like new risers for our school. We host community events that help bring our community together. An example would be STEM night or Paint Night. It is a chance for our students and families to learn something new while completing a project. Teacher grants benefit everyone in the school. Ameritown is a Field Trip all students who attend the school will eventually attend in 5th grade. It is expensive and would be a hardship on families if we did not help provide the buses. Risers are used by everyone at the school. We use them for each grade's performance and we use when we host events like Veteran's Day or when the choir performs or when different grades are performing. We have been working to raise money for an amphitheater. Currently our school is too small to host all our students and parents in a single room. We had hoped to hold the money for that until we are able to go through the process of building an amphitheater.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 69% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 70
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 75.1%; rating input score 75
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 24.9%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.92; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 75.1% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $26K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.