Enabling Movement Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
842615571
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
Location
Highland Villag, TX, USA
Phone
9726915301
Rating
37
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Neurology, Neuroscience Research

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$59,833
Expenses
$11,775
Assets
$107,718

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Julie Brown (Founder)
  • Joan Cain (cofounder)
  • Kerry Brown (board member)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Enabling Movement Foundation is a 501 c (3) organization established to help support the health and wellbeing of the disabled population by providing community programs with specialized equipment to enable safe movement. These programs support all ages and diagnoses. The specialized adaptive equipment assist the disabled individual? s movement, thereby offering some of the same opportunities as ablebodied individuals have for exercise, movement and recreation.

What it reported doing in 2025

Cruising Cyclers Adaptive Outdoor cycling program allows the disabled, any age of level of disability, to experience the joy of cycling on the outdoor trails at the same speed as ablebodied individuals by utilizing our specialized adaptive equipment. This program provides equal movement opportunities to all with our specialized equipment. Movement is so important to our overall health and wellness. In 2025, we had 85 adaptive cycling rides; 70 were regular season rides, 15 were special event rides. We served all ages and levels of disabilities. Our riders age range was from 11 years old to 70 years old, with mildly impaired disabilities to severely impaired. Diagnoses included autism, ataxia, cerebral palsy, sci, stroke etc. All riders enjoyed rides ? most were repeat riders. The number of cycling rides increased 25% from the previous year.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 76% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 79
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 80.3%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 9.15; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 6 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.