Empowered Youth Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 753128668
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2021
- Forms available
- Form 990 2021, Form 990-N 2012
- Location
- Miami, FL, USA
- Phone
- 7863174160
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $295,471
- Expenses
- $253,833
- Assets
- $35,139
- Liabilities
- $17,920
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
People named in this filing
- CARLOS VALDES (DIRECTOR)
- COLLEEN ADAMS (EXECUTIVE DI)
- JERRY FICKEL (CFO)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To break the cycle of teens who are or have been in the juvenile detention center by empowering them to create a lasting transformation and a positive life for themselves and the community.
What it reported doing in 2021
Empowered youth's main goal is getting the empowered youth cafe/food truck incubator program running successfully. The cafe/food truck operates as a training/job development program for students and graduates so they can get hands-on experience that will lead them to expanding the franchise and launching a vibe 305 franchise at the end of their training that will then train and employ more inner-city youths nationwide. The training period gives the time, exposure and discipline to perfect their management and cooking skills under the supervision of experts in the restaurant and food truck industries. The ultimate goal is for the young men and women to create a vibe 305 cafe truck franchise and share in the net profits of that activity and to give them a sustainable future to keep the cycle of prosperity moving forward.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 62% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 64
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 83.2%; rating input score 83
- Program expense ratio: 96.9%; rating input score 97
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 14.1%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.14; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.51; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.6% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 83.2% of revenue deployed · 96.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $246K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2014 to 2021
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 11/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.