Employment Resources Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 391681074
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Madison, WI, USA
- Phone
- 6082463444
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Centers to Support the Independence of Specific Populations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,065,352
- Expenses
- $3,038,876
- Assets
- $1,339,241
- Liabilities
- $638,029
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PAT SCHRAM (PRESIDENT)
- SANDY HALL (VICE PRESIDENT)
- TEANGELO CARGILE JR (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- TEANGELO CARGILE JR (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $119,409 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Since 1990, eri's mission is to practice and promote innovative services to advance employment opportunities, support personal choices, and enhance the well-being of people with disabilities. Eri provides employment and benefits counseling, career planning, and community outreach services to people with disabilities who are considering, pursuing, or maintaining employment. Eri also provides statewide consultation, training, and technical assistance to employers, human service professionals, disability advocates, government agencies, and the public on disability, benefits, employment, and related community inclusion issues.
What it reported doing in 2025
Eri provides employment and benefits counseling services to dane county residents with mental health needs and to youth with developmental disabilities through contracts with dane county. Eri also delivers services statewide through funding and partnerships with the Wisconsin division of vocational rehabilitation, long-term care organizations, the u.s. Social security administration's work incentive planning and assistance program, and the ticket to work program.in addition to direct client services, eri provides consultation, training, technical assistance, and educational resources to professionals, agencies, employers, and community partners. Eri worked with the Wisconsin department of health services, universities, and other state and national partners to design, develop, and implement educational materials, websites, webinars, and learning management systems. These activities focus on disability and employment issues, benefits planning, work incentives, and evidence-based practices that support employment opportunities for people with disabilities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 94
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.5%; rating input score 84
- Program expense ratio: 85.2%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 90%; rating input score 90; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.9%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.44; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.48; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.9%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 84.5% of revenue deployed · 85.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 10 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $119K · 13 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $103K reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 14/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 17/100.