Employment Placement Professionals

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
204526073
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2017
Forms available
Form 990 2014, Form 990-EZ 2017, Form 990-N 2011
Location
Long Beach, CA, USA
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Employment Procurement Assistance

Reported finances

Revenue
$181,067
Expenses
$227,292
Assets
$53,964
Liabilities
$125,138

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ENID AWAD (President)
  • ANN JOHNSON (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • ENID AWAD (President)
  • ANN JOHNSON (Vice President)
  • ANTONIA ZOVAK (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The primary purpose of the Corporation is to assist persons with physical, sensory, mental and developmental disabilities to live independently and be productive in the community. The goal of independence can be achieved through ongoing information, referral, direct services and specialized training by the Corporation. The Corporation serves all persons with disabilities regardless of color, ethnicity, creed, age or income. The Corporation is organized exclusively for educational and charitable purposes within the guidelines of Section 501(c) (3) of the Internal Revenue Service Code of 1954

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 98
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 16
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 95.2%; rating input score 95

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -25.5%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.24; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 2.32; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 93.4% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -24.8% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 95.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $216K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2015 to 2017
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is not authorized to operate as a charity in California.