Empathy in Nature
Legal name: Empathy in Nature Project Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 870856460
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- San Diego, CA, USA
- Phone
- 6193922465
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Kindergarten, Preschool, Nursery School, Early Admissions
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $376,076
- Expenses
- $635,125
- Assets
- $112,285
- Liabilities
- $3,810
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANGELINA GIOVANNINI (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- ANGELINA GIOVANNINI (PRESIDENT): $150,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Empathy in Nature is a social-impact organization making nature-based, whole-child learning more equitable and accessible.
What it reported doing in 2024
In 2022 empathy in nature created the grow outside program, which works with local under-resourced schools to transform their learning environment into a natural playground. Children go from playing on hot asphalt lots with no shade, to living breathing learning spaces, ideal for social and emotional growth, steam learning opportunities, and developmentally appropriate activities to improve physical and mental health. This program includes a process that starts with inclusive community planning, bringing together stakeholders in the school and surrounding area to envision the space, to share their challenges, experiences, and visions of what would serve the children, teachers, and families best. Following this process, empathy in nature holds different events including a community volunteer day, a children's art day, and a first day of play event to ensure that it is community-embedded throughout. EIN has developed a curriculum that includes a 6-part storybook series, accompanying field guides, and individualized field guides that support nature-based, social and emotional learning. Teacher workshops are an integral part of the grow outside process, and are held in a very different way than most teacher training programs. Workshops are interactive, engaging, and involve moving away from the traditional, conference or classroom setting, with creative and welcoming invitations to play (provocations) that provide hands on inspiration for educators, instigating a paradigm shift towards a more child-centered, play-based approach to learning, where the environment serves as a teacher and teachers serve as guides. Over the past year we have developed a relationship with a major university who is helping to fund transformations of head start programs in san diego. We have transformed 3 schools into nature play learning centers, trained over 200 educators within the head start program on nature-play and social and emotional teaching practices, affecting hundreds of children today and thousands over the next 10 years who will come through these schools. Through the university partnership, we are collecting and studying the data on these schools to add to the body of research and knowledge pertaining to nature play and social and emotional best practices for young children. In addition, we have transformed an outdoor space for an elementary school, increasing their outside, social and emotional learning time by 90%. The school is reporting more creativity, art, free play, and positive behavior since the outdoor learning environment went in.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 10
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 94.1%; rating input score 94
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -68.9%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.18; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 23.6%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 31.5% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -86.3% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -94.9% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 94.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $598K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $150K · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 36/100.