Emotion Hygiene Alliance
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 844956811
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2025
- Location
- Solvang, CA, USA
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Adult, Continuing Education
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $125,235
- Expenses
- $10,025
- Assets
- $201,192
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
1 person listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Lena George (President)
People named in this filing
- Lena George (President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
EHA advances trauma-informed well-being practices by developing and supporting practical tools trainings and convenings for stakeholders in key sectors such as education healthcare community services and related fields. Its programs focus on equipping practitioners and leaders with accessible well-being hygiene practices that can be integrated into their daily work to improve individual and collective capacity for resilience and care.
What it reported doing in 2025
During 2025 EHA primarily focused on program development stakeholder engagement and fundraising activities to support future programming. Direct programming was limited while foundational infrastructure was being built. Pilot training programs and related educational initiatives are in motion in 2026.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 42
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 76
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 8.2%; rating input score 8
- Program expense ratio: 99.8%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 92%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 20.07; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 99.8%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 52.2% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 66.7% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 8.2% of revenue deployed · 99.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $10K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 8/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.