Emergency Medicine Patient Safety Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 270057395
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2013
- Forms available
- Form 990 2011, Form 990-EZ 2013
- Location
- Folsom, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9163576723
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Medical Disciplines
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $45,104
- Expenses
- $103,648
- Assets
- $21,583
- Liabilities
- $13,012
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
People named in this filing
- Ramon Johnson MD (Chairman)
- Dianne Vass (Executive Direc)
- Drew Fuller MD (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Promote patient safety in emergency care through education, collaboration, patient advocacy, research and training. Develop and disseminate key tools and resources to help providers create safer emergency departments and safer care to prevent harm and save lives.
What it reported doing in 2013
Development and support fellowship program for emergency medicine patient safety research designed to identify patient safety risks in emergency department systems. Support of a patient safety leadership fellowship designed to educate and train leaders to implement changes to improve patient safety in emergency departments.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 99
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 10
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 98.5%; rating input score 98
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -129.8%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.21; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.6; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 28.9%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -29.6% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -51.2% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -74% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 98.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $102K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2012 to 2013
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.
- High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is not authorized to operate as a charity in California.