Emerald Coast Community Wellness Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 462773334
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Niceville, FL, USA
- Phone
- 8508657006
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Community Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,084
- Expenses
- $8,968
- Assets
- $352,684
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TERESA HALVERSON (PRESIDENT)
- ALAN GIESEMAN (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- TERESA HALVERSON (PRESIDENT)
- ALAN GIESEMAN (VICE PRESIDENT)
- MARA CLARK (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To positively impact our community’s health and wellness through education, collaboration, and financial investment.
What it reported doing in 2024
Community fundraising events to raise awareness of health issues and educate the community on the importance of preventive healthcare in improving overall health and supporting other 501(c)(3) charities in the community that provide healthcare services to individuals in need.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 68% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 46
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -190.8%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 39.33; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -25% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -10.6% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.5% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 3 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.