Emanuel Medical Center Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
936095667
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2019
Forms available
Form 990 2019
Location
Portland, OR, USA
Phone
5034155600
Rating
63
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$555,571
Expenses
$201,957
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • TRENT S GREEN (EX-OFFICIO): $820,714 total reported compensation
  • MAUREEN A BRADLEY (EX-OFFICIO): $438,686 total reported compensation
  • K RENA WHITTAKER (Executive Dir.): $245,737 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of emanuel medical center foundation is to foster charitable giving as well as community commitment and involvement to support the mission and vision of legacy emanuel hospital & health center.

What it reported doing in 2019

Emanuel Medical Center Foundation was established in 1972. Charitable gifts to the Foundation advance the programs and services of Legacy Emanuel Medical Center with the goal of improving the health of the community and the region.Legacy Emanuel Medical Center provides acute and tertiary care to the city and the region. Founded in 1912 by the Lutheran Church, the hospital is recognized as a medical pacesetter and is well known for its trauma, emergency and intensive care programs. Legacy Emanuel is also the largest provider of hospital charity care in the region. Major programs include: Level 1 Trauma Center, the highest designation for emergency care Oregon Burn Center, the only verified burn center in Oregon Inpatient and transport-based extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) program Hyperbaric medicine program High risk obstetrics intensive care Cardiology, Neurosurgery and Orthopedic Surgery Injury prevention programsSome of the specific projects funded in this period included: Provided emergency medications, durable medical equipment, transitional housing, and other health-related supplies to uninsured, under-insured, and low-income patients.Funded training and equipment for the ECMO program at Legacy Emanuel Medical Center.Provided burn prevention and education program to power industry, healthcare agencies, and the broader community.Supported burn camp and other activities for burn survivors.Provided Stop the Bleed training to teachers/staff within area public high schools and provide life-saving hemorrhage control kits to the schools that receive training. Supported ongoing medical education for trauma providers at Legacy Emanuel Medical Center, as well as for rural and community hospitals.Supported the Clinical Pastoral Education program.Supported therapeutic garden programming.Supported continuing medical education and research through the medical staff library.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 83% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 57
  • Transparency & Controls: 71
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 45
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 42.7%; rating input score 43
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 72.7%; rating input score 73; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 63.6%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 102.8%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -20.5% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -4.5% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.8% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 42.7% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 11 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $202K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $821K · 11 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 15 of 15 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2009 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 18 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 43/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.