Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 952413054
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Covina, CA, USA
- Phone
- 6269638411
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospital, General
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $155,667,737
- Expenses
- $143,569,519
- Assets
- $177,555,772
- Liabilities
- $28,481,635
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
23 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RAJESH SHARMA (PRESIDENT & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- RAJESH SHARMA (PRESIDENT & CEO): $3,062,396 total reported compensation
- LEON CHOINERE (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $638,852 total reported compensation
- STANLEY KOZAKA (PHARMACIST): $293,547 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to help people keep well in body, mind, and spirit by providing quality health care services in a safe, compassionate environment.
What it reported doing in 2024
Emanate health foothill presbyterian hospital (fph) is an acute care hospital which provides inpatient, outpatient, and emergency care to the surrounding community. Fph provides for, on average, 77 patients per day. Total adjusted inpatient days were 53,829. Outpatient and emergency visits totaled 58,209. Fph provided traditional charity care at cost totaling $2,574,358, unreimbursed medi-cal program cost totaling $22,139,740 and other community benefit cost totaling $462,173. During 2024, fph recorded a net supplemental payments of $6,570,241 from the California hospital fee program for the hospital services to medi-cal fee-for-service and medi-cal managed care patients covered for the period from january 1, 2024 to december 31, 2024.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 96% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 69
- Accountability: 87
- Sustainability: 62
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 81.6%; rating input score 82
- Program expense ratio: 87.9%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.8%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.24; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 81.6% of revenue deployed · 87.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 16 of 17 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $126.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $3.1M · 23 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $19.5M reported
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 6 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.