Elyssas Mission NFP
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 205631710
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Northbrook, IL, USA
- Phone
- 8476979181
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Delinquency Prevention
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $788,480
- Expenses
- $727,644
- Assets
- $1,343,606
- Liabilities
- $15,028
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOANNE MEYERS (President)
Highest reported compensation
- JODIE SEGAL (DIRECTOR OF SOS PR): $130,722 total reported compensation
- JOANNE MEYERS (President): $85,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Elyssa's mission educates and screens teens on warning signs of suicide to help identify at-risk youth, link them to vital resoucres and ultimately prevent suicide.elyssa's mission fully funds and implements evidence-based suicide prevention programs in middle and high schools, providing hands-on support with planning, training, program implementation and data analysis to ensure program success.
What it reported doing in 2025
Sos signs of suicide is a suicide prevention education program.hope squad program is a peer-to-peer prevention program.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 87
- Accountability: 37
- Sustainability: 50
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 85.2%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 91.5%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.7%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.85; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 29.6%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11.9% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.9% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 18.5% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 85.2% of revenue deployed · 91.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 11 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $666K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $131K · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 26 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2015 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 51/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Board meeting minutes documented not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 59/100.