Elsberry Ffa Alumni
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 273367115
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990 2018, Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Elsberry, MO, USA
- Phone
- 3144964754
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $73,770
- Expenses
- $55,183
- Assets
- $374,925
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KIMBERLY JONES (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- KIMBERLY JONES (PRESIDENT)
- NIKKI WATTS (VICE PRESIDE)
- JENNIFER HUNTER (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
1) to support and promote the ffa organization, ffa activities and agricultural education on local, state, and national levels. 2) to provide a tie to the ffa and to assist ffa and agricultural education personnel to involve former members and others in supporting worthy activitites. 3) to promote greater knowledge of agricultural industry and support education in agriculture. 4) to cooperate with elsberry ffa chapter and the Missouri state and national ffa alumni association. 5) to promote and maintain an apprciation of the american free enterprise system. 6) to promote the personal development aspect of ffa.
What it reported doing in 2022
Education and assistance paid for the benefit of members
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 61% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 75% for direct work, and 25% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 68
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 74.8%; rating input score 75
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 25.2%; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.79; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 25.1% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -8.8% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.8% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 74.8% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $55K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2017 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.