Elogeel Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
934884977
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Sacramento, CA, USA
Phone
5102162281
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,054,139
Expenses
$1,243,501
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • AbdelRahman Elogeel (President)

People named in this filing

  • AbdelRahman Elogeel (President)
  • Muhamad Lotfy (Treasurer)
  • Amr Hanafi (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Elogeel Foundation EF is dedicated to bridging communities alleviating human suffering and fostering educational opportunities.

What it reported doing in 2025

During the tax year the Foundation continued its charitable activities in the United States Jordan and Egypt consistent with prior years. Shortly before year-end the Board of Directors approved the cessation of operations and initiation of dissolution. All program activities ceased prior to the end of the tax year. In the United States the Foundation provided grants to IRS-recognized Section 501c3 organizations and limited direct assistance to low-income individuals and families. Domestic organizational recipients included Human Development Fund EIN: 92-2204466 Zakat Foundation of America EIN: 36-4476244 Givelight Foundation EIN: 56-2500794 Jaamiah Ajax USA Inc EIN: 27-3567823 Support Life Foundation EIN: 47-1675693 Yalla Kafala EIN: 85-3323627 Hidaya Foundation EIN: 77-0502583 Silicon Valley Academy EIN: 86-1113567 and Muslim Community Association EIN: 27-2442632. All grants were made in furtherance of the Foundations exempt purposes. In Jordan the Foundation made grants to established nonprofit organizations serving vulnerable populations including Hosn Al-Eman Organization and the Jordan Hashemite Charity Organization JHCO which provide humanitarian assistance and essential services to underserved communities. Egypt remained the Foundations primary area of service during the year. Activities included grants to charitable institutions and limited direct assistance to individuals in need. Contributions supported hospitals and medical organizations serving low-income patients including Liver Patients and Treatment Association Magdi Yacoub Heart Foundation Shefaa Al-Orman Oncology Hospital Wahat Noor El-Hayah and Childrens Cancer Hospital Egypt. Additional grants were made to organizations working to alleviate poverty and improve living conditions in underserved areas including Tawfiqiyya Sharia Association Geel Al-Sahaba and Elsanad Foundation. The Foundation also provided direct financial assistance to individuals facing hardship addressing urgent needs such as food household essentials and medical expenses. All activities were conducted in furtherance of the Foundations exempt purposes prior to cessation of operations.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 83% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 13
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 91.8%; rating input score 92
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Fail
    • Conducts field audits: Fail
    • May suspend future funding: Pass
    • Requires financial reports: Pass
    • Conducts site visits: Fail
    • Requires grant agreements: Fail
    • May require repayment: Fail
  • Grant itemization coverage: 94.5%; rating input score 95; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -18%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -39% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -59.5% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -200% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 91.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 40 of 42 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and grants
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 5 of 8 not reported.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.