Elm Grove Woman's Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 390968418
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Elm Grove, WI, USA
- Phone
- 2627824321
- Rating
- 92
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Women's Service Clubs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $110,404
- Expenses
- $148,221
- Assets
- $253,846
- Liabilities
- $891
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHELLE FITZGERALD (PRESIDENT)
- JEAN SCHINDLER (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
People named in this filing
- MICHELLE FITZGERALD (PRESIDENT)
- JEAN SCHINDLER (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
- LYNN HORVATIN (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide volunteer and financial contributions to deserving groups and individuals with a concentration on elm grove and the waukesha county area.
What it reported doing in 2024
Conduct annual student art scholarship competition for more than 50 years. Awarded over $50,000 to high school seniors and undergrads since 1969. Publish biennial village directory as a courtesy to all residents and businesses. Host santa breakfast and memorial day pancake breakfast for the community. Provided discounted clubhouse rentals to community groups. Paid grants to donna lexa art centers, elm grove police academy, operations helping hand, hope center, and supported a veteran revitalization project. Egwc members donated $2,350 through the women to women program to area nonprofits with a focus on women and children, health, safety, and literacy. Countless volunteer hours were provided to community nonrprofits through the volunteer hours of egwc members.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 90% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 96
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 87.9%; rating input score 88
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -34.3%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.71; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.9% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 87.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $130K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 48/100.