Elluminate Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
133897852
IRS 990 coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
2128361730
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Affiliation
Judaism

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,889,120
Expenses
$1,674,572
Assets
$3,584,715
Liabilities
$266,564

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

22 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • AELA MORGAN (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • MADELYN BUCKSBAUM ADAMSON (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • LINDA YARDEN (PRESIDENT)
  • MELANIE ROTH GORELICK (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • MELANIE ROTH GORELICK (CEO): $224,614 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization empowers feminist jewish women leaders and philanthropists to advance equity andsocial justice. The organization focuses on the following: supporting jewish women nonprofit leaders and their organizations by providing training andfunding, fostering collaboration, and sharing best practices to accelerate social change through agender lens. Building a global leadership network for jewish women leaders who are addressing andfinding innovative solutions to today's most intractable issues. Transforming traditional philanthropic models to strategically direct funds towards womenadvancing social change. Educating the broader community on issues that are emergent in important areas with a genderlens.

What it reported doing in 2024

Elluminate, a network of jewish women for equity and justice, has created a unique and dedicated space for jewish women entreprenurial leaders and executives working for social innovation within and outside the jewish community. The collective, our signature leadership advancement program, has trained, supported, and connected 60 jewish women executives working for social change. As a participant in the program they participate in, elluminate provides a two-year curriculum focused on leading through a jewish and gender lens, cohort groups, peer-to-peer relationship building, capacity grants for their organizations, and individual professional development training, they also become part of the elluminate network and get a national platform for their cause including a dedicated webinar called crown jewel conversations. Through this work we are impacting ending the feminization of poverty, creating a more inclusive and diverse jewish community, advocating for democracy and equality in israel and the us, and working for reproductive justice, gender justice, and women's safety. We also run a "women in the c-suite" program for jewish women ceos who come together monthly on an informal base to share challenges and opportunities with peers and network. This has been an important space since october 7, where jewish leaders can find a safe space to speak about how the massacre in israel impacts them personally and their organization and work. We run an annual national conference that brings together jewish women philanthropists, advocates, and individuals along with professional jewish leaders and experts to grapple with emergent issues impacting women rights, queer talmudic study, eliminating mass incarceration, ending sex trafficking, and educating disadvantaged communities. To supplement our grantmaking, elluminate educates the community and advocates for policies that positively impact marginalized communities at the local, federal, and international level. Elluminate is uniquely positioned to create long-lasting, systemic, and impactful change. Members of elluminate have the opportunity to hone and share their philanthropic voice to affect change in New York, israel, and around the globe. Since our inception in 1995, elluminate has awarded over $6 million to more than 250 projects, programs, and organizations.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 60% for direct work, and 40% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 61
  • Transparency & Controls: 62
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 59
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 66.3%; rating input score 66
  • Program expense ratio: 66.8%; rating input score 67
  • Fundraising efficiency: $4.61 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 88.2%; rating input score 88; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Fail
    • Conducts field audits: Fail
    • May suspend future funding: Fail
    • Requires financial reports: Fail
    • Conducts site visits: Fail
    • Requires grant agreements: Fail
    • May require repayment: Fail
  • Grant itemization coverage: 85.9%; rating input score 86; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 11.4%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.14; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 13.4%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0.4% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -6.4% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 66.3% of revenue deployed · 66.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 20 of 20 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $225K · 22 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 28 of 30 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 18 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 17 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 7 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 16/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 27/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.