Ellenville Regional Hospital Foundation
Legal name: Ellenville Regional Hospital Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 371562427
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2015
- Location
- Ellenville, NY, US
- Phone
- 845-210-3043
- Rating
- 62
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $333,260
- Expenses
- $53,273
- Assets
- $2,108,897
- Liabilities
- $13,270
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
28 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DEBORAH BRIGGS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- STEVEN L KELLEY (DIRECTOR): $583,488 total reported compensation
- BOB RUE (FINANCE DIRECTOR): $317,066 total reported compensation
- DEBORAH BRIGGS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $39,792 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Ellenville Regional Hospital is dedicated to delivering exceptional, compassionate healthcare to everyone who lives in, works in, or visits our surrounding communities. We are committed to improving community health through a foundation of clinical excellence, innovation, and the use of advanced technology, always guided by respect, dignity, and the needs of those we serve.
What it reported doing in 2024
Ellenville regional hospital foundation provides affordable housing for medical students being educated on the ellenville regional hospital campus. Ellenville regional hospital is a teaching hospital as well as a critical access hospital.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 71% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 61% for direct work, and 39% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 40
- Transparency & Controls: 69
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 81
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 22.5%; rating input score 22
- Program expense ratio: 83.1%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 96.2%; rating input score 96; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 84%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 39.59; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 155.3%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 21.7% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 14.6% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.9% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site
- Where the money goes: 22.5% of revenue deployed · 83.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 25 of 26 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $44K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $583K · 28 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 21 of 22 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 22/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 9 not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 48/100.