Elizabethtown Police Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 473802857
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2016
- Location
- Elizabethtown, KY, USA
- Phone
- 2707661800
- Rating
- 47
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Crime Prevention
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $88,362
- Expenses
- $20,486
- Assets
- $464,512
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
People named in this filing
- CHRISTY CHILDERS (BOARD MEMBER)
- HUNTER HAMMER (BOARD MEMBER)
- KELLY EMERINE (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Providing goods, services and funds to members of the elizabethtown police department and their immediate families, who are in need due to extraordinary events in their lives, providing of goods, services and funds to elizabethtown police department to provide for equipment and/or other needs that are considered by the board to be extraordinary requirements, providing funds for the educational enhancement of members of the elizabethtown police department and the raising of funds through various means, including solicitation, fundraising and gaming, to further the purpose of the corporation.
What it reported doing in 2024
Ts scholarships
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 88
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 76.8%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 22.67; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -32.1% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.7% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 19.8% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.