Elite Youth Sports Program

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
472787243
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2014
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2014
Location
Bakersfield, CA, USA
Phone
6614364934
Rating
42
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Amateur Sports Competitions

Reported finances

Revenue
$35,446
Expenses
$35,061
Assets
$385
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ED WRIGHT (PRESIDENT)
  • DAVE GARCIA (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ED WRIGHT (PRESIDENT)
  • VARINA GONZALEZ (SECRETARY)
  • LUPE CHAVERRIA (SARGENT AT ARMS)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Elite Youth Sports Program will be a mainstay for both the community and our youth. We will teach the merits and benefits of teamwork, competition, and sport to kids each year. Our program consists of the Athletic Amateur Union (AAU), and a broadband of coaches here locally in Bakersfield from all different walks of life (i.e.: city workers, police officers, correctional officers and a rehabilitation counselor). The kids range in age from 5 to 14 and live throughout our community. We truly feel that the intangible benefits our youth receive through participating in tackle football cannot be tracked with a price tag. The life skills they achieve by participating are invaluable to them as they enter and move through their childhood and into adulthood.

What it reported doing in 2014

We were able to help approximately 130 kids learn the sport of football and cheerleading. We provided a safe-haven for these kids. We also taught them how to work as a team. We also checked on the kids grades to be sure they were keeping up with school first and not just sports.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 72% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.1%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.01; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 4/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 48/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.