Elijah Ross Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
270952154
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2020
Forms available
Form 990 2019, Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
Maitland, FL, USA
Phone
4074977807
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Public Foundations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$-80,562
Expenses
$75,986
Assets
$2,127
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

People named in this filing

  • ROBIN LERNER (DIRECTOR)
  • RICHARD LERNER (DIRECTOR)
  • MARC REICHER (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To support a variety of organizations supporting children and youth causes using golf as a vehicle to raise support. Due to the pandemic, the event was not held in 2020. Therefore, income/donations into the organization was primarily gifts that did not clear in the 2019 calendar year from the 2019 event. Most expenses paid in 2020 were incurred in 2019. Grants to organization made in 2020 were from funds raised at special event in 2019.

What it reported doing in 2020

Since the year 2000, the elijah ross foundation inc. Has used an annual golf event in orlando, Florida as a means to raise funds to support a variety of organizations supporting youth and childrens causes. Since 2010, net proceeds totaling more than $500,000 from the december classic golf event have supported the neonatal intensive care unit (alexander center for neonatalogy) at winnie palmer hospital for women and babies in orlando Florida, and helped support its recent expansion.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 75
  • Sustainability: 20
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -194.3%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.03; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -50% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -30% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2015 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 5/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.