Electronic Arts Intermix Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237146941
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2123370680
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Film, Video
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $710,997
- Expenses
- $916,276
- Assets
- $927,017
- Liabilities
- $679,649
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- REBECCA CLEMAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- REBECCA CLEMAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $87,021 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Founded in 1971, electronic arts intermix (eai) is a nonprofit arts organization that is a leading resource for video and media art. A pioneering advocate for media art and artists, eai's core program is the distribution and preservation of a major collection of over 4,000 new and historical video works by artists. For over 40 years, eai has fostered the creation, exhibition, distribution and preservation of video art, and more recently, digital art projects.eai supports artists through the distribution, preservation, exhibition and representation of their media artworks, and works closely with educators, curators and programmers to facilitate exhibitions, acquisitions and educational uses of media artworks. Eai provides access to video art within an educational and cultural framework.
What it reported doing in 2024
Artists' videotape distributioneai's artists' media distribution service is a leading national resource for video art and digital media by artists. Eai distributes a major collection of experimental media artworks to cultural, arts, and educational audiences across the nation and around the world. Eai provides access to over 5,000 new and historical media works by over 200 emerging and established artists, from the 1960s to the present. The eai media art collection is recognized as a significant artistic and cultural resource. This program reaches wide audiences and diverse constituents at universities, museums, libraries, and other venues across the united states and around the world. Eai also furthers public engagement with media art through extensive online resources, viewing access, preservation, and educational initiatives.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 69% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 68
- Sustainability: 21
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 93.9%; rating input score 94
- Program expense ratio: 72.7%; rating input score 73
- Fundraising efficiency: $3.7 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -28.9%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.01; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.73; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.5%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 93.9% of revenue deployed · 72.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 5 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $666K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $87K · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 12/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 38/100.