Elbert County Alliance Dba Elbert County Partnership
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 872854478
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Denver, CO, USA
- Phone
- 7203588708
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Community Coalitions
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $23,685
- Expenses
- $25,758
- Assets
- $2,529
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
People named in this filing
- BILL HOWELL (DIRECTOR)
- DAN ROSALES (DIRECTOR)
- SEAN TONNER (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission for the elbert county partnership is to promote the common good and general welfare of elbert county communities by bringing about civic betterment and social improvements, to protect the agricultural history, while promoting the county to be a great place to live and raise a family. We uphold the deep conservative values, property rights, god and country by standing for the constitution. As the county grows, we want to promote choices in housing, strong education, job opportunities, access to goods & services, protection of our water, improve roads and traffic and improving our first responders. Unity and common values are focused with the help of citizens who have the county's best interests at heart.
What it reported doing in 2024
The mission for the elbert county partnership is to promote the common good and general welfare of elbert county communities by bringing about civic betterment and social improvements, to protect the agricultural history, while promoting the county to be a great place to live and raise a family.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 33
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -8.8%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.1; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 14.9% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -10.7% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.