El Segundo Regents Inc DBA Los Angeles Jr Kings
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 954743868
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2016, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- El Segundo, CA, USA
- Phone
- 3103221465
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Winter Sports
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $234
- Expenses
- $5,128
- Assets
- $3,109
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
People named in this filing
- Helen Alex (Treasurer)
- Stephen Yovetich (Board Chairman)
- Rosemary Voulelikas (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote the personal character and athletic development of those players who wish to excel at the highest level of hockey competition that USA Hockey, CAHA and SCAHA leagues have to offer. To provide financial resources for those players to achieve their goals, to assist and promote player advancement to the "next" level, and to seek out and aid players finding educational opportunities for the student-athlete.
What it reported doing in 2024
Provide financial resources to the children and families, 18 years old and younger, so that they have an opportunity to play ice hockey on teams and in competitions sanctioned by local affiliates of SCAHA, CAHA and USA Hockey. The organization serves 25 teams with approximately 450 players and members covering over 6 counties in Southern California.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 17
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2,091.5%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.61; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -33.3% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -35.1% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -25.7% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2017 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 34/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.