El Paso Kids N Co

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
202890890
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2014
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2014, Form 990-N 2013
Location
El Paso, TX, USA
Phone
9152748797
Rating
56
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Theater

Reported finances

Revenue
$88,046
Expenses
$82,820
Assets
$9,966
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MEL CARREON (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
  • JEANNETTE BAKER (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)
  • STELLA GUTIERREZ (BOARD PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MEL CARREON (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
  • JEANNETTE BAKER (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)
  • DAVID HAMILTON (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization's exempt purpose is theather education for children and presentation of community theather in el paso, Texas

What it reported doing in 2014

Student classes, camps and production 10 seminars/workshops were attended by 192 students, 187 master classes were attended by 3,277 students 184 rehearsals were attended by 3,131 audience members 70 performances were attended by 4,834 audience members of which 2,417 were youth. A total of 11,434 persons attended seminars, classes, rehearsals and performances combined.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Member-benefit provider. The nonprofit used 100% of its reported program spending for member benefits.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 39
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 46
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 38.4%; rating input score 38
  • Program expense ratio: 40.8%; rating input score 41

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.9%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.12; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -27.8% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -9.8% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 38.4% of revenue deployed · 40.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $34K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2009 to 2014
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 38/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 41/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.