El Paso Art Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 746049418
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- El Paso, TX, USA
- Phone
- 9155347377
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $118,134
- Expenses
- $118,645
- Assets
- $72,497
- Liabilities
- $41,935
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LETICIA LUEVANOS (PRESIDENT)
- ELEANOR SMITH (VICE-PRESIDENT)
- KARLA ZANELLI (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- LETICIA LUEVANOS (PRESIDENT)
- STEPHANIE CONWELL (SEC/TREASURER)
- ELEANOR SMITH (VICE-PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide artists, students and the general public the opportunity to learn and grow in the visual arts, regardless of age, race, religion, citizenship, talent or physical condition. More than 6,000 people attend the programs during the year.
What it reported doing in 2025
Crossland art gallery
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 76% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 51
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 29
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 51.2%; rating input score 51
- Program expense ratio: 51%; rating input score 51
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.4%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.61; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.58; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 25.8%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -5.2% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.9% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 51.2% of revenue deployed · 51% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $60K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 51/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 51/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 29/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.