Ek Woodlee Memorial Youth Camp Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 621262363
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Columbia, TN, USA
- Phone
- 9313887872
- Rating
- 60
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,764,037
- Expenses
- $13,028
- Assets
- $2,847,981
- Liabilities
- $55
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BEN SANDERS (PRESIDENT)
- ADAM WOOD (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- BEN SANDERS (PRESIDENT)
- ADAM WOOD (VICE PRESIDENT)
- DAN STRASSER (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Camp woodlee exists to provide the youth of Tennessee an experience that instills a love of nature, builds lifetime relationships and creates lifelong memories. This mission is achieved by utilizing a connection with nature, experiential learning and relationship building.
What it reported doing in 2025
Camp woodlee provides Tennessee youth with an immersive outdoor program centered on nature, relationship building, and shared responsibility. By minimizing modern amenities, the camp fosters structured leisure and deep interpersonal connections. Participants develop character and life skills through experiential learning and by maintaining the facility themselves. This mission-driven program instills environmental stewardship and leadership through a group-based camping style focused on community and the natural world.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 100% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 33
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 98
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0.5%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 99.8%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 99.5%; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 218.6; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 0.5% of revenue deployed · 99.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $13K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 18 of 18 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 1 filing year from 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.