Eiteljorg Museum of American Indians and Western Art

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
311139447
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Indianapolis, IN, US
Phone
317-636-9378
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Museum, Museum Activities

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$13,581,775
Expenses
$9,794,622
Assets
$87,780,391
Liabilities
$11,191,889

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

35 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KATHRYN HAIGH (PRESIDENT & CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • KATHRYN HAIGH (PRESIDENT & CEO): $300,186 total reported compensation
  • SUNNY REED (VP ADMIN & CFO): $168,977 total reported compensation
  • ALISA NORDHOLT-DEAN (VP OF PUBLIC PROGRAMS): $108,832 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The eiteljorg museum explores the intersection of the arts, histories and cultures of the past and present by sharing the diverse stories of the american west and the indigenous peoples of north america.

What it reported doing in 2024

Exhibitionsin fiscal-year 2025, exhibition-related programming enriched each major show. For acts of faith: religion and the american west, audiences were captivated by a live dance performance featuring joti singh and zenon, bringing movement and contemporary expression into dialogue with the exhibition's themes. The opening of alfred jacob miller: revisiting the rendezvous in scotland and today was equally compelling, highlighted by a gallery talk with guest curator karen mcwhorter and independent scholar gregory hinton, who offered insightful perspectives on miller's legacy and the exhibition's transatlantic context.large crowds gathered for raven and the box of daylight, especially for a gallery talk and presentation by special guest artist preston singletary (tlingit). Visitors were inspired not only by his incredible glass work but also by hands-on opportunities to explore the medium themselves through additional glass workshops offered in partnership with local studio hot blown glass. The spring exhibition radical stitch opened with an energetic weekend of programming that brought together two guest curators and six featured artists. Through gallery tours, live demonstrations, and a lively panel discussion, visitors gained firsthand insight into the creative processes and cultural narratives embedded in the works on view.in may, the newly renovated lilly community gallery reopened with an exhibition featuring members of the watercolor society of Indiana, underscoring the museum's commitment to local artists.the artists in residence program expanded its reach both within the museum and throughout the broader community. Ephraim anderson (navajo), glenda mckay (cook inlet region athabascan), and bobby silas (hopi) engaged guests through demonstrations, conversations, and workshops. Their impact extended beyond the museum walls to Indiana university bloomington, purdue university west lafayette, the boner community center, haughville branch library, and workshops hosted at the indianapolis art center. Member-exclusive coffee and conversation programs proved especially popular, and artists provided exciting workshops for visiting school groups and adult learners alike. A brief but impactful residency with dante biss grayson culminated in the museum's first-ever fashion show, made possible through generous support from partners purdue native american educational and cultural center and the Indiana native american indian affairs commission. That event marked an exciting expansion into new creative formats and celebrated indigenous design and expression.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 74% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 68
  • Transparency & Controls: 73
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 81
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 66%; rating input score 66
  • Program expense ratio: 77%; rating input score 77
  • Fundraising efficiency: $13.41 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 27.9%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.96; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.9%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 66% of revenue deployed · 77% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 32 of 32 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $7.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $300K · 35 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $979K reported
  • Consistency: 37 of 37 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 47/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 44/100.