Einstein Community Health Associates

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
232760086
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2011
Forms available
Form 990 2011
Location
Philadelphia, PA, USA
Phone
2154566762
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$31,134,117
Expenses
$31,134,117
Assets
$8,263,000
Liabilities
$6,900,000

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

29 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The albert einstein healthcare network is a not-for-profit corporation that controls related organizations in a health care delivery system serving the greater Delaware valley through sole membership in those related organizations. The albert einstein healthcare network ("aehn"), the parent company, together with its related member organizations, comprises the albert einstein healthcare network ("network"). Einstein community health associates ("echa") is a controlled organization through sole aehn membership. Echa incorporates physician office operations providing primary care services in the community. Echa has, as its principal purpose, the elevation of the health status of the greater philadelphia community. Einstein community health associates, inc. Achieves its mission by providing superior and compassionate health and healing services to the patients and communities it serves and by training physicians to be accomplished leaders through scholarly activity, excellence in teaching

What it reported doing in 2011

ECHA provides primary medical care, including pediatrics, obstetrics/gynecology and family medicine to individuals who reside within the primary service area of AEHN. ECHA physician providers serve to foster access to medical services for individuals who are in need of primary care, but who otherwise may not have a family physician. Enhanced accessibility in underserved areas can lead to improved health status and a reduction in dependence on the healthcare system. ECHA specifically targets those individuals within the service area who may be most vulnerable to illness, serving the elderly, expectant mothers, newborns and others with needed medical care.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 97% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 74
  • Accountability: 92
  • Sustainability: 22
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 86.4%; rating input score 86; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.27; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.84; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.5%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 21% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 19 of 22 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $29.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $1.9M · 29 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed
  • Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2009 to 2011
  • Related organizations: 16 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 33/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.