EIHAB Human Services
Legal name: Eihab Human Services Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 113376415
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Springfield Gardens, NY, US
- Phone
- (718) 276-6101
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Centers to Support the Independence of Specific Populations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $35,815,336
- Expenses
- $34,985,123
- Assets
- $49,958,789
- Liabilities
- $14,400,986
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JASON WONSANG (PRESIDENT)
- HAMDY ELGINDY (CEO/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- TANIA BAZZI (VICE PRESIDENT OF BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES)
- TONIQUA BIGELOW (VICE PRESIDENT OF OPERATIONS)
Highest reported compensation
- HAMDY ELGINDY (CEO/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $478,224 total reported compensation
- TANIA BAZZI (VICE PRESIDENT OF BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES): $224,079 total reported compensation
- TONIQUA BIGELOW (VICE PRESIDENT OF OPERATIONS): $222,080 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Everyone, regardless of race, religion, color, gender, age, sexual orientation, or disability deserves the same opportunities for dignity and self-respect. We have a moral mandate to do our utmost to support individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families.
What it reported doing in 2024
Eihab's ira residential services provide 24-hour exemplary care and person-centered planning to ensure that individuals lead fulfilling, productive lives. Each of our well-appointed homes provide a safe, nurturing, family-like environment. Our goal is to assist our clients to strive for greater independence and community inclusion.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 99% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 88
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 47
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89.7%; rating input score 90
- Program expense ratio: 91.7%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.3%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.43; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.29; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.4%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 7 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 3 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 89.7% of revenue deployed · 91.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 6 filed program accomplishments · $32.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $478K · 12 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $816K reported
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 43/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 48/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.