EHM Apologetics INC

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
394527879
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Abilene, TX, USA
Rating
71
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$52,772
Expenses
$14,964
Assets
$37,808

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Eric Hernandez (President)

People named in this filing

  • Eric Hernandez (President)
  • Stephen Eklund (Director)
  • Michelle Eklund (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

EHM Apologetics Inc. is organized and operated exclusively for religious and educational purposes under Section 501c3 of the Internal Revenue Code. The organization equips believers and engages skeptics through Christian apologetics by providing teaching public speaking educational resources digital media content and discipleship training. Its mission is to advance the Christian faith by defending and explaining the truth claims of Christianity promoting biblical literacy and fostering respectful dialogue on matters of faith reason and worldview.

What it reported doing in 2025

EHM Apologetics conducts apologetics training evangelism outreach and public speaking engagements designed to equip Christians to articulate and defend the Christian faith. Activities include church seminars evangelism outreach public dialogue with skeptics and the development of educational resources addressing intellectual objections to Christianity and presenting the Gospel. These activities support the organizations religious and educational mission.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 55
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 66
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 28.4%; rating input score 28
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 71.6%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.53; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 47.8%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 28.4% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $15K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 28/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.