Eglise E Maranatha Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
510678458
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Brockton, MA, USA
Rating
41
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Limited
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$67,314
Expenses
$65,434
Assets
$144,835

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Jean-Raymond Jasmin (President)

People named in this filing

  • Jean-Raymond Jasmin (President)
  • Patrick Jean (Director)
  • Gaelle Normil Phildor (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The church is to evangelised people in the area of Brockton and the cities around. The church has been teaching and preaching the Gospel to diverse group of people in the city, help those in need, pray for the sick, feed the hungry, present the children before God, continued to baptize the converts, solomnise weddings, give communion, perform funeral ceremony.

What it reported doing in 2022

The Church visited and prayed for the sick at the hospital within the community for five months in 2022 and spent $200 per month to an orphanage in Hati and evangelised people in the Street of Brockton, Avon and Randolph every Saturday afternoon from 1-4 pm. The church gave music lesson to some kids in the community on Thursdays and Saturdays. The church also performed two wedding ceremonies, baptized three adults and two children in 2022 and served communion 54 times. The church held several sessions, including bible study meeting by 104 sessions, as well as preached the Gospel in 104 sessions and performed one funeral service. This notwithstanding, the church also provided four dinners in 2022 whereby people in the community were invited to commune with the rest of the church members.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 12
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 44
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 18.6%; rating input score 19
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.8%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.21; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 18.3%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 18.6% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 19/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 51/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.