Eei Compass Educational Partners Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 272605527
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Waukesha, WI, USA
- Phone
- 2625429546
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Student Services, Organizations of Students
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $564,892
- Expenses
- $793,565
- Assets
- $286,383
- Liabilities
- $324,229
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANDREW NEUMANN (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER/BOARD MEMBERS)
- YESENIA FITZHUGH (REGIONAL EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AZ)
Highest reported compensation
- ANDREW NEUMANN (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER/BOARD MEMBERS): $449,952 total reported compensation
- DANIEL DEPIES (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $308,717 total reported compensation
- JEREMY EHLERS (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $250,125 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Compass educational programs were created to complement the education a child receives during the school day and in the family setting. For parents who are seeking faith-based educational enrichment for their child, compass provides a safe and loving support system with peace of mind. Compass offers preschool as well as before- and after-school care conveniently located on school campuses. Our goal is to provide each family with high-quality learning options in a loving christian environment.
What it reported doing in 2024
Preschool and before and after care programs - educational programs for k-8 schools complementing the education a child receives during the school day and in the family setting.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 11
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 91.6%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 75%; rating input score 75; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -40.5%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.36; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.13; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.9%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.4% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 91.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 4 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $727K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $450K · 8 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 5/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 31/100.