Edward Horace Johnson Leadership Academy Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
992740940
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Cary, NC, USA
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Educational Services and Schools - Other

Reported finances

Revenue
$7,000
Expenses
$7,111
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$111

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Emily Kenny (Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • Emily Kenny (Executive Director)
  • Shirley Johnson (Principal)
  • Robin Ramsey (Curriculum Specialist)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Edward Horace Johnson Leadership Academy EHJLA is a private educational institution established to provide middle and high school students with a rigorous academic education while fostering strong moral values character development and leadership skills. The organization was founded to prepare students to become responsible ethical and impactful leaders in their communities and future professions. EHJLAs primary purpose is to cultivate academic excellence personal integrity and servant leadership through a supportive and values-driven learning environment.

What it reported doing in 2025

The organizations intended measurable outcomes include improved academic performance increased student proficiency levels enhanced leadership and character development and greater student readiness for future academic and professional success. EHJLA is scheduled to open in Fall 2026. Because the organization is currently in its developmental phase specific program service accomplishments and performance data are not yet available. However the Academy anticipates tracking and reporting measurable student outcomes once operations begin.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 26
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1.6%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 200% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 39/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.