Edward H Angle Southern California Orthdontic Society
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 952593174
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2015, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Tustin, CA, USA
- Phone
- 7145445345
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $54,691
- Expenses
- $51,630
- Assets
- $158,003
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JASON PAIR (President)
- TINA SIU (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- JIM ZAHROWSKI (Treasurer)
- DAN BANH (Secretary)
- JASON PAIR (President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Its primary exempt purpose is to keep its membership informed about the latest information, technology, and developments in orthodontic practices.
What it reported doing in 2024
Angle fall meeting - 1 day scientific meeting at san gabriel county club - san gabriel, ca - friday october 11, 2024. Speakers - sunil kapila, glenn jou, maurico gonzalez, james zahrowski, warren schacter an david rynearson. Topics - ai in orthdontics, digital advances in clinical orthodontics, the versatility and benefits of the bioprogrssice therapy and teaching cases.approx 80 attendees.the program service is provided as a benefit of membership dues paid. There is no charge to participate.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 95
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 55
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 92.6%; rating input score 93
- Program expense ratio: 98.1%; rating input score 98
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.6%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.06; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.4% per year; rating input score 0; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 92.6% of revenue deployed · 98.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $51K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.