Educurious Partners
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 273199763
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2023791800
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Social Science
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $6,214,243
- Expenses
- $4,134,107
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JANE CHADSEY (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- JANE CHADSEY (CEO): $173,148 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Prepare young people for school, work, and life through authentic project-based learning experiences that spark curiosity, foster collaboration, and ignite the skills and dispositions to be long-life learners and thrive in an ever-changing world.
What it reported doing in 2023
Educurious is a seattle, wa-based 501(c)(3) organization which originated with a grant from the bill & melinda gates foundation in partnership with the university of Washington. Educurious designs and delivers authentic project-based learning (pbl) curriculum and learning experiences for young people and professional development opportunities for educators. Their design principles are grounded in the science of learning-understanding how and why people learn. Their approach engages and inspires students to acquire deep content knowledge while developing the skills and dispositions to succeed in school, work, and life. Educurious curriculum and professional development opportunities are delivered digitally, in-person, and virtually in the united states and u.s. Territories. Educurious also designs and offers a wide array of open education resources (oer) which are freely available online through sprocket, a platform originally developed by lucas education research. Educurious has directly impacted over 48k educators and 346k students across 32 states, puerto rico, and the u.s. Virgin islands.other accomplishments include:-expanded work in Washington state to co-develop curriculum units for students in kindergarten and 12th grade.-collaborated with denver public schools to co-design standards-aligned social studies pbl curriculum in grades 6-12. -created renewable energy vehicle and infrastructure technician training (revit) program for high-schoolers pursuing dual-credit pathways. This curriculum integrates science with career and technical education to prepare students for careers in renewable energy.-in partnership with the department of elementary and secondary education (dese) facilitated statewide professional development for elementary educators in Massachusetts.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 57
- Transparency & Controls: 70
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 48
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 52.9%; rating input score 53
- Program expense ratio: 81%; rating input score 81
- Fundraising efficiency: $0.15 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 33.5%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.2%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 52.9% of revenue deployed · 81% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $173K · 8 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 53/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 1/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.