Educational Opportunity Association Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
391315014
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Kenosha, WI, USA
Phone
2317506101
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$836,460
Expenses
$868,072
Assets
$816,105
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

22 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ADAM CINDERICH (PRESIDENT)
  • CINDY VIRTA (PAST PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ADAM CINDERICH (PRESIDENT)
  • CINDY VIRTA (PAST PRESIDENT)
  • KAREN SMOLAREK (PRESIDEN-ELECT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To bring community persons who have an active interest in or who are professionally involved in broadening accessibility to and success in formal postsecondary education. The association is particularly concerned about students who, by reason of socioeconomic station, first generation status, ethnic definition, military veteran status, and/or disability, are in a position of disadvantage with traditional mainstream american students.

What it reported doing in 2024

The purpose of the educational opportunity association, (the association) is to bring together into a work and study community persons who have an active interest in or who are professionally involved in broadening accessibility to and success in formal postsecondary education. Major foci will be: 1) elements which prepare students for postsecondary educational experiences; and 2) institutional responses to the challenge of serving more diverse student populations. The association is particularly concerned about students who, by reason of socioeconomic station, first generation status, ethnic definition, military veteran status, and/or disability, are in a position of disadvantage with traditional mainstream american students. The association seeks to accomplish its purpose(s) by: 1) promoting research, evaluation, programmatic and fiscal planning, and training inclusive of, but not limited to, conducting workshops and seminars, and educating the public and public officials to the concerns of the association; 2) developing the capability to make timely and meaningful responses to issues and concerns affecting the educational resources and environments of students; 3) encouraging the development and expansion of a communications network primarily for persons professionally involved in educational opportunity programs and services; 4) engaging in the specific and general coordination of efforts with other organizations and persons having purposes supportive of or in harmony with association concerns; and, 5) awarding scholarships to students in accordance with the purposes of the association and according to qualifications established by the board of directors and the general assembly in conjunction with the eoa foundation.in 2024, accomplishments included conducting an eoa annual professional conference, emerging leaders institute; providing scholarships to college and pre-college participants; and providing professional development workshops for: eoa scholarships "how to" q & a session; ins & outs of coe's legislative conference; emerging leaders institute information q & a; "no props provided" by paradigm shift; three sessions for legislation & education "return on investment; "trauma informed virtual training; two sessions of program roundtables; "ignite your potential" workshop; and a student leadership conference for college and pre-college participants.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 86% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 93% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 74
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 64
  • Sustainability: 45
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 83.6%; rating input score 84
  • Program expense ratio: 82.8%; rating input score 83
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -3.8%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.94; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 83.6% of revenue deployed · 82.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 22 of 22 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $719K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 22 people listed
  • Consistency: 16 of 16 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 41/100.